Oral presentation
Present your research in person at the venue, with a standard allocation of 15 minutes.
he timing matters. In only a few years, generative AI has entered newsrooms, agencies and classrooms; platforms have changed how audiences find, share and trust information; and local journalism, public service media and the business models behind them are under pressure. These shifts raise questions that no single discipline can answer alone. CMCONF is designed as a media research conference where journalism scholars, sociologists, psychologists, cultural studies researchers, computational social scientists and practitioners can compare methods and findings in one place.
Researchers at every career stage are welcome, including doctoral candidates presenting their first work. If you are looking for a broad media studies conference with a strong research focus, this is where your work will find an engaged, international audience.
A world in which communication and media research helps societies stay informed, connected and able to govern themselves well.
To connect rigorous research on communication and media with the people and institutions that shape how media works.

The conference covers communication from the interpersonal to the global. Contributions may be empirical, theoretical, critical, historical, computational or practice-based, and comparative and interdisciplinary studies are especially welcome. News research has a central place: as a journalism studies conference, CMCONF welcomes work on newsroom practice, press freedom, misinformation and trust in news. For researchers of platforms, creators and online cultures, it is equally a digital media conference, treating technology as a social and cultural question rather than only a technical one. And because artificial intelligence now shapes how content is produced, ranked and moderated, it is also an AI and media conference, with room for studies of generative AI in journalism and the creative industries, algorithmic curation, synthetic media and platform governance. Research on political, health, strategic and intercultural communication, and on film, television and popular culture, completes the scope. Studies with null or unexpected results are equally welcome, because they help others avoid repeating approaches that do not work.
Every submission is assessed through double-blind peer review, so reviewers and authors do not know each other's identities. Reviewers judge relevance to the conference scope, originality, clarity of aims and methods, and the quality of the argument or evidence. Submissions are screened for similarity with iThenticate, and authors confirm that their work is original, approved by all co-authors and, where it involves human participants, conducted with appropriate ethical approval and consent.
Research using social media posts, platform data or online communities should respect data protection law, platform terms and the privacy of the people whose content is studied. Authors are expected to describe their data and methods transparently, so that findings can be discussed and compared fairly. The conference is open to participants of every background, discipline and career stage.
Presenters submit an abstract for review and register after acceptance.
Listeners attend in Oxford without presenting and do not need to submit anything.