Scientific Committee review supports the conference's academic quality and credibility.
Double-blind peer review · iThenticate screened
ISBN Abstract Book · Proceedings with ISSN & DOI
Publication Routes
Four Levels of Publication
Level 1
Level 1 — Abstract Book with ISBN
All abstracts that are accepted and registered are published in the conference Abstract Book, which carries an ISBN. You can publish an abstract only; a full paper is not required for this route.
Level 2
Level 2 — Conference Proceedings with ISSN and DOI
Full papers are published in the conference proceedings, which carry an ISSN. Each published paper receives a DOI and is discoverable through Google Scholar.
Conditions:
The related abstract has been accepted and registered.
The full paper follows the Author Guidelines.
The full paper passes double-blind peer review.
The full paper is received by 6 June 2027.
Level 3
Level 3 — Journal Opportunities
Selected full papers may be considered for publication opportunities in Scopus-indexed journals; final acceptance depends on paper quality and the decision of journal editors. Journals make their own editorial decisions under their own review processes.
Level 4
Level 4 — Monograph / Academic Book Opportunity
Participants may have the opportunity to develop their research into a monograph or academic book. Manuscripts submitted for book publication undergo peer review. Accepted books receive an ISBN and DOI. This route allows authors to explore their research in greater depth than a standard journal article.
Benefits
- Present the research as a comprehensive scholarly work.
- Strengthen the author's academic profile.
- Reach researchers, academics, students, and practitioners.
- Expand the author's publication record and support future academic or professional opportunities.
This route is subject to editorial assessment and available capacity. Expressing interest does not guarantee publication, and final decisions follow peer review and rest with the publisher.
Peer Review
Peer Review and Editorial Process
Abstracts and full papers are assessed through double-blind peer review under the oversight of the Scientific Committee. Reviewers consider relevance, originality, methodological quality and clarity. Authors may be asked to revise their work before a final decision; revised material must be sent using the update link in the reviewer's email and by the deadline it states.
Ethics
Publication Ethics
Every submission is screened for similarity using iThenticate, part of Crossref Similarity Check. Similarity screening supports editorial judgement; it is not a verdict on whether AI was used.
Authors confirm that their work is original, unpublished and not under review elsewhere.
Generative AI may be used in manuscript writing only to improve the language and readability of the authors' own text, with disclosure. AI used in the research itself is described in the methodology. Applicable AI declarations are kept with the editorial record and accompany the published work where required.
Indexing
Indexing and Visibility
Each paper published in the Conference Proceedings or in a journal receives its own DOI, registered with Crossref, allowing it to be cited and accessed through a permanent link. Conference Proceedings are indexed in Google Scholar. Journal articles may also be indexed in recognized scholarly databases such as DOAJ, Scopus, and other indexing services, depending on the journal in which they are published.
Scopus
Google Scholar
Clarivate
EBSCO
DOAJ
Publication Dates
Publication Timeline
Abstract BookPrepared after registration closes; distributed to registered participants around the conference dates
Proceedings publicationFollowing completion of review and DOI registration
Journal opportunities listWithin 2 weeks after the conference
Authors who have already submitted an abstract send their full paper using the link in their original confirmation email, or by following the instructions in Help & Support. The full-paper deadline is separate from the abstract deadline.